We've all had one of those uncomfortable moments when a reply to a life (confronting) question is challenged or scrutinized to microscopic detail. Where our defences kick in and we wonder how we got cornered in the first place. A perfectly enjoyable conversation a minute earlier turns into a situation you try to extricate yourself from without appearing rude.
I have perfected the art of "diversion" over the years. Well, I thought I had until a perennial question got thrown into the limelight recently. Not once and not just twice. But on three occasions by three different individuals, unrelated to each other. I would have shrugged it off if not for the fact that all this occurred within a 24 hour period. I left each conversation feeling worse for wear and by the time I met up with a close friend the following weekend, the feeling of bewilderment had seeped in.
After some pause for thoughts, she asked how I would respond to the following scenario:
You are swimming in the open seas with the shoreline within sight. You are an able swimmer and not in any trouble. A float passes by...
Assume you will make it to the shore with or without the float.
Question: Would you grab the float and use it to assist as you swim to the shore OR would you ignore the float and swim to the shore on your own accord?
Now, as with any metaphors, there is no right or wrong answer. When life throws you a curve ball, you always have to choose. You have to take a stand and live with the consequences. Basically, your response reflects your comfort zone which is the product of your environment, your character and your experiences to date.
The answer I gave was immediate and instantaneous. But how quickly I responded also gave me some food for thought. So I tested the scenario on some friends and colleagues. I was intrigued by their initial reaction as normally this represents your gut instinct, ie what you'd do if you only have seconds to react to a given situation. (Some even wondered if this was a trick question which amused me to no end).
There are a few variables and what these may mean to you. But it’s fair to say that for most, the interpretation of the variables is more or less similar. The "open seas" represent life. The "shoreline" is the (final) destination point and the "float" is something that (may) help you achieve the end result. The point being made of an "able" swimmer is important because your ability to reach the shore is not dependent on the float. Also, remember the beach is within sight or to put it simply, this life we are living will end. Therefore, the choice that you make becomes rather black and white. That is, to take the float or simply pass it by.
“Take the float”
Not surprisingly, the majority chose to swim to the shore with the float. For many, if the float is there, why not just grab it. The reasons for doing so are logical and practical. The float will come in handy when you really need it. Especially if there are choppy waves or you need to lean on the float and rest for a while.
One particular response cracked me up – the float is good for the land too because he'd hoped he would be “mistaken” as an actor from Baywatch (how 90s can you get???). Hence, the float is useful not just as a potential life saving device but also to attract “chicas” (his word not mine) when he finally clambered to the shore. I did not have the heart to tell him that he would essentially be a dead man by the time he made it to the beach.
A couple of people even cautioned about cramps (fair point) and one person was afraid of being stung by jelly fish! Therefore the float represents the ultimate life saving apparatus if the ability to swim is being severely tested (this individual knows who she is!).
“Take the float and swim away from the shore”
Certain comments led me to believe that some serious thinking took place. One said, "use the float and swim further away from the shore now that you have an aid. When you go further you can explore more places and expand your horizons. Why go back to the shore that you already know and have been to countless times?"
To this particular friend, I would say not even a float is sufficient! I would be praying very hard for a speedboat instead! However, jokes aside, this friend of mine had a point. For many, the end of life is not something you like to dwell on. I agree about not lamenting on it but I am also not afraid when my time is up.
What should be of great importance to all of us is that we have swum in the open seas, enjoyed it as best we can and visited various places before we hit that final shore. Life after all is one continuous journey.
“Take the float but release it if it belongs to someone else or if someone needs it more than you”
Out of all the “take the float” responses I received, this one with the condition(s) attached is probably the most telling.
Like it or not, we are essentially selfish beings. The concept of self preservation motivates our actions. I don’t think this is necessarily wrong but I question this when a selfish act is detrimental to someone else, or even perhaps to ourselves. We don’t have to look very far to come across such action. Take a simple example - you are seated on a bus. More people come onboard – question is whether you will give up your seat to the needy? On countless occasions I have seen people (pretend to) focus intently on their mobile devices while a heavily pregnant lady boards a bus or an elderly passenger shuffles down the aisle. Now, if we are selfless individuals, there won’t be a need for expensive marketing campaigns to encourage people to be more considerate. We would simply do the right thing without being told or asked.
Now imagine this: you are holding onto the float and another swimmer comes along. He/she proves it to you that the float belongs to them or needs it more than you. Would you give it up even if you are suffering from cramps? Let’s bring this closer to home: what if the float represents something / someone that/who will be hard for you to give up even if you realise subsequently that the thing/the person cannot be by your side until you reach the shore.
Is it really that simple to let go of the float once you have had the benefit of it for a while? Personally, I know I will struggle. Maybe it is easier to let go when dependency is not there. I know some of you will disagree and counter that when such situation presents itself, you will do the “right” thing. I pray you will but in all likelihood, some of you won’t.
and lastly...
“Leave the float”
The minority surveyed chose to swim to the shore on their own. The reasons were varied but largely driven by the undisputed ability and confidence to reach the land by themselves. Some suggested the float may be needed (more) by others. One individual decided to ignore the float as it might belong to someone else. The latter two responses are interesting in light of the preceding discussion.
Or perhaps, for some, the float is more of a hindrance than an aid? That at times, it is just easier to swim alone, since we will reach the end at some point in time. Why extend one arm (or even two) to bring the float along with you when instead they can be used to propel your way forward. And let's face it, if you got stung by a jelly fish, a float is not going to help you much!
Whether I choose to take the float or swim to the shore on my own should be fairly obvious to you. My only caveat is that my reaction to the scenario would likely be different if the question was posed to me in my teens, my twenties or even a year back. Ask me again a few years down the road and I may have changed my mind. But one factor is constant – whatever action I choose to take, I know there will be risks. My only hope is that the rewards along the way far exceed the costs that may come with the decision I make.
There is one thing I definitely won’t do and that is to (quote someone literally) “float away in my thoughts and by the time I wake up, neither the float nor the shore is in sight!” Specifically to that individual in question, I pray the shore is not within sight because you have already made it to heaven’s gates, with or without the float :->